- AI / ROBOTICS .... HUMANITY! .. are you sure ?? . K-pop Vladimiro Di Vito with a masterpiece by George Duke 80 '- Reach FOR IT - Advances in AI (AI) and robotics at the end producing entity capable of Creative Real Human Feeling and Natural Spontaneous Creativity for Understanding Art and Create Art equally or better than humans? The artist Vladimiro Di Vito has explored this intriguing question in a couple of thoughts that cause video performance using dance masterpieces of the 80s (SHINE ON REACH FOR IT) George Duke soundtracks and himself as interpreter. His premise is: how would the robots' performance? And a robot could create the same emotional response than that of a beautiful piece of music, art or dance of a human artist? In other words: these are videos of a human being, pretending to be a robot, pretending to be a human. Take a moment to wrap your brain around that! Interesting puzzle. FUSION: ART + = MECHANICA BEAUTY? It might be that robots could become entertainers of the future. Possible? Certainly. But at what cost? And we would feel satisfied? Of course, the work could certainly be beautiful, elegant and exciting. But it would probably be in a mathematical way lilting, complicated? He ... an emotion? O SOUL? The beauty of human creativity is the unexpected in every work: what are the prospects? Because the artist zig instead of zag? Why is red instead of blue? Or for that dissonant and strident E flat that makes you shiver on the spine instead of a more comforting C major? Or a machine can create that beautiful note of a distinctive voice that no other singer can duplicate? Artists with their instincts, physical skills, imagination and ability to change their minds at random, creating works that excite, inspire, enthusiasm you, keep us on the edge and make the audience go "Now, why did not I think of that ??? " When you think about it, the art concerns the human connection, understanding feelings, ideas, emotions. Could a piece of art created by a machine to do the same? Possibly. But if the machine can do it, then we would still need humans? Over time, artists have always used the latest technology to express their creativity. And as the new technology will come in the future, I'm sure they will use it. But somewhere along the way you might get that turning point where technology bypasses the artist. What then? We are creating planned obsolescence for ourselves? There is a way of happy medium where peaceful co-creativity can occur? Written by Vladimiro Di Vito

 - AI / ROBOTICS  VS HUMANITY! .. 
Are you sure ?? . 

K-pop Artist Vladimiro Di Vito with a masterpiece by George Duke 80 '- Reach FOR IT - Advances in AI (AI) and robotics at the end producing entity capable of Creative Real Human Feeling and Natural Spontaneous Creativity for Understanding Art and Create Art equally or better than humans? The artist Vladimiro Di Vito has explored this intriguing question in a couple of thoughts that cause video performance using dance masterpieces of the 80s (SHINE ON REACH FOR IT) George Duke soundtracks and himself as interpreter. His premise is: how would the robots' performance? And a robot could create the same emotional response than that of a beautiful piece of music, art or dance of a human artist? 
                                                                                                Reege's Tech Reviews

In other words: these are videos of a human being, pretending to be a robot, pretending to be a human. Take a moment to wrap your brain around that! Interesting puzzle. 

FUSION: ART + = MECHANICA BEAUTY? 
It might be that robots could become entertainers of the future. Possible? Certainly. But at what cost? And we would feel satisfied? Of course, the work could certainly be beautiful, elegant and exciting. But it would probably be in a mathematical way lilting, complicated? He ... an emotion? O SOUL? 

The beauty of human creativity is the unexpected in every work: what are the prospects? Because the artist zig instead of zag? Why is red instead of blue? Or for that dissonant and strident E flat that makes you shiver on the spine instead of a more comforting C major? Or a machine can create that beautiful note of a distinctive voice that no other singer can duplicate? Artists with their instincts, physical skills, imagination and ability to change their minds at random, creating works that excite, inspire, enthusiasm you, keep us on the edge and make the audience go "Now, why did not I think of that ??? " 


When you think about it, the art concerns the human connection, understanding feelings, ideas, emotions. Could a piece of art created by a machine to do the same? Possibly. 


But if the machine can do it, then we would still need humans? 
Over time, artists have always used the latest technology to express their creativity. And as the new technology will come in the future, I'm sure they will use it. But somewhere along the way you might get that turning point where technology bypasses the artist. What then? 

We are creating planned obsolescence for ourselves? There is a way of happy medium where peaceful co-creativity can occur?